This blog belongs to Patricia Atkinson and was created as part of the Education Media Design and Technology program at Full Sail University.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Week 2 Reading: The Art of Possibility Chapters 1-4




The Art of Possibility

First of all, I want to say that this book is absolutely amazing and the first text book that I have ever read in my life that is an actual page turner. I love all the stories and student words, as well as how it reverts back and forth between the authors. It is so down to earth and inspirational. This morning, I bought 3 copies on Amazon—one for me, and one for my mom and dad. Their philosophies are so profound and echo my own very closely. I love the concept of contribution in life, “giving the A”, and just reaching beyond the constructs and conventions of society. I would like to make some chapter specific reflections:

Chapter 1

“It’s All Invented”

I thought the discussion about perception, and how humans have specific mind maps to understand the world around them that are developed over their whole lives was very interesting. I have noticed in my teaching that students have very different mind maps, priorities, and preconceptions than when I was in high school 7 years ago. We all, but especially them, in their little bubbles, do not step back and think about how our minds work. It is so true that there are frameworks in all of our minds that are influenced by categorizing, story-line organization, and a network of assumptions.


It is inspiring to think about leaving all that behind and looking at life with a fresh perspective. It reminds me that we as teachers never know what’s going on with a kid beyond our class, and we need to give them the benefit of the doubt and the most positive reaction we can muster even when they act up. You never know, and maybe never will know, what a difference that choice made in that person’s life.

Chapter 2

“Stepping Into A Universe of Possibility”

I liked the discussion here about the world of measurement vs. the universe of possibility; how people live in the world of measurement and there are hierarchies of what is safe, how to survive in a world of limited resources. I never had thought about how scarcity-thinking and survival-thinking are different from the actual condition; how pressure from invented realities or fear of what could happen causes unnecessary anxiety. This phenomena reminds me of a part in the young adult novel The Giver by Lois Lowry (1993). The setting is a future “perfect” society in which everything is cut and dry, literal, and void of all emotion. There, young children are beaten if they were to say, “I’m starving”, because it is a lie, an exaggeration of the hunger feeling. In our society, so many things are also taken out of context. They get so far gone that the construct becomes the assumed reality. I feel that has happened with the process of standardized testing (which we are in the midst of right now), and how learning, and in turn funding for the school, is catered to performance on this test. Isn’t the convention of taking a final assessment being a good measure of learning completely blown out of proportion here? Do we really have the best intentions for our children in mind? And it is being transferred because now, with a month of school left, kids think they are “done” and can totally slack (and let go with their manners) because testing is over. How much better would it be if we were teaching them that learning has no culminating end, that there are profound concepts to be learned that can’t be answered in multiple choice format, and that everything in life cannot be re-done and re-done until you pass?

As stressed in the reading, the important thing is to reflect on HOW thoughts and actions ARE a reflection off the conventions of a measurement world. If I could somehow transfer just that simple concept to my students, I think they would grow a lot in all facets of their life.

Chapter 3 and 4 “Giving” and “Contributing”

What a beautiful story about the starfish woman to start chapter 4. I had heard it before, but often thought of it and similar stories (like you read in FW emails) on my worst days of teaching. When I want to give up because some ignorant students called me a bleep bleep bleep or smashed someone else’s artwork or threw a chair or clogged my sink or hid a dirty paintbrush, I try to remember the subtle positive changes I MUST have made somewhere along the road. The smiles, the hearsay of students mentioning artists we have learned about in other classes, the Facebook requests after graduation, the thanks, the personal growth that is shown in their artwork over time in my class. This is what makes it worthwhile to get through the struggles. And as a veteran teacher once told me, “high school students are like daffodils…they may not bloom the first year, in fact they might just stay in the dirt. But you still water ‘em and give it your best. Then, many years down the road, they will bloom and it will be from something you planted or helped with—even if you never are around to see it.”

I thought the concept of “Giving An A” was beautiful, especially when explained through those amazing student responses. The Michelangelo “revealing the statue” analogy also made sense. I kind of already do that in my grading philosophy, although I don’t discuss it as an instigation of creativity as he does. I can understand that this theory would be great in music class, because there is so much risk-taking involved in being expressive. I laughed out loud at what they do when they make a mistake—putting their hands in the air and saying “how fascinating!” I do that in my own way too. Its more in the line of: student spills something or breaks something or messes something up, and then gives me that scared look of apprehension, like I’m about to go off. Even though I want to, I always remember how my mom reacted to me when I had accidents…and how sad I feelwhen I see the opposite in a store or on a movie (like a mom slapping or cussing at a kid for making a simple mistake). Making these small choices to look beyond the initial negative reaction is what makes us richer individuals and better leaders. I will try to “re-define” my audience as Roz did to her group of graduate students. They are all great artists, eager and ready to participate and create (maybe I should make that my screen saver J ) I AM a gift to others and so are they!

References

Leslie, N. (2002). Left and Right Brain Function: B0003920, Wellcome Images. Available under Creative Commons at http://images.wellcome.ac.uk/

Lowry, L. (1993). The giver. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Herring, M. (n.d.), Perception of 3D Objects: B0003936, Wellcome Images. Available under Creative Commons at http://images.wellcome.ac.uk/

Shaffner, P. (2007). Starfish_02_(paulshaffner). Available under creative commons at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Starfish_02_(paulshaffner).jpg

Zander, B. & Zander, R. (2000). The art of possibility. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.





Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Week 1 Post 4: General Reflection on Copyright: Shepard Fairey


Since there is not a specific project this week, I have decided to reflect a little bit about my work with students about Shepard Fairey. I did him for my Artist of the Week presentation, which usually entails a PowerPoint, video(s), or website that goes over the body of work and life of the artist. Students take a few notes and then we have a class discussion. The students reacted a lot to his work and the story about the lawsuit. Some students loved his work, the boldness and modern "graphic-y" look. They recognized some images from popular culture such as the Obey campaign, and of course, the Obama poster, as well as one of the other images of the guns and roses, which apparently, one of my students has as a tattoo (which brought up a whole new conversation about copyright and tattoos--one student mentioning that Hangover2 is getting sued over a Mike Tyson tattoo?). Some students thought his work was repetitive, narrow, and didn't take as much talent because it was made on a computer.

The issue of the lawsuit inspired quite a debate, varying greatly between my sections but always 2-sided. Some students said that he should have given the photographer credit. Some said if its on the internet, its easy to get, and therefore up for grabs. Some said he changed it so much that it shouldn't matter. Some said he didn't have any other choice 'cause he doesn't have a press pass to get a photograph. Some said Obama is such a figure-head, and in a political campaign, so his photographs should be fair use. Most agreed that Shepard should have at least given Garcia credit. I really enjoyed getting the kids talking about the issue and broadening their minds to the idea of credit and fair use. The more they realize the details of both sides, the more they will understand how these same issues effect their own lives.

Image Attribute:
By Shepard_Fairey.jpg: Cliff from I now live in Arlington, VA (Outside Washington DC), USA
2009
derivative work: Davidowenmorgan (Shepard_Fairey.jpg) [CC-BY-3.0 (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
Link to this image on Wikimedia Commons

Week 1 Response to Peer Reading: Thomas Wood








Michael Wood's Original Reflection:





Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Week 1 Response to Peer Reading: Peter Binskin




Peter's Original Post:

That was a great spread of information and personal stories about copyright in this digital age presented in the videos. Copyright is something that has been constantly with me through the years and something I’ve looked at closely in Australia and America. Being a songwriter I am constantly reminded of copyright issues as I consider the melodies I create and, as a performer, I am reminded of the idea of paying for what you use and respecting others work as I would have them respect mine.
Back in the early 90s I was a product demonstrator at Mac World in Sydney for a product that was the first version in what would be later known as Protools. I remember that there were two types of people coming to my stand. One type would be marveling at the technology available to manipulate sound to create new music, the other would be furious at those same abilities used to steal other’s creations (or manipulate their songs without permission). I had more than one person literally screaming at my Mac II and me that I was the beginning of the end of music and should be ashamed at my part in it.
I think it affected me so much that, since that time (until Garageband and even then I try to only use percussion and add my own live instruments) I would create my own percussion loops rather than sample someone else’s songs even though I had the gear to do it.
That’s why the Good Copy/Bad Copy video was quite personal to me and those same issues that faced me twenty years ago are still being faced around the world.
As a registered songwriter in Australia I still receive a very small amount of money every year from the performing rights association, not for the royalties of my music being played on TV or radio but from an amount that is paid to this same association (and then distributed to its members) by the Chinese government because they do not keep records of the sale, distribution or airplay of copyrighted music. This is one way in which governments are recognizing their responsibilities to artists but it does nothing to change the situation in that country.
I also loved the list of Brad Templeton’s copyright myths. I have heard every one of those come from the mouths of friends, colleagues and people who claim to be in the know and some of them very recently. Certainly number one is huge. Even though copyright is automatic, however, it’s easier to take someone to court if you have a piece of paper from the copyright office rather than a self addressed, sealed envelope with your CD and a fading postmark to prove that your wrote it and when.
I have to say, a positive thing about the course we are doing is that this knowledge about copyright and where to find creative commons and public domain material is going to help save us (and/or our bank accounts) in this digital age as we continue to create materials to help us deliver more effective education to our classes. We don’t know where it’s going to end up or who’s going to see so we better have all the creative bits locked down legally.

Saturday, April 30, 2011

Week 1 Reading: Copyright Issues Part 1-3






















Wow, where to begin. That was a lot of information to digest about copyright. I really appreciated all the different perspectives of the various videos that we looked at how each one interwove more details about the history of copyright and how it has transformed into its current state. For the sake of organization and clarity, I will respond to each section of videos separately.


Part 1: Intro to copyright


I never knew how copyright started and it made sense that it was books, being the earliest printed form of creative expression. I am curious why the concept of a fixed time on copyright ever came about. Did our ancestors have a notion of the benefits of some sort of eventual creative commons-type remixing? It seems that if instigated by the creators, copyright law would have been inherently forever. I think the fact that it was not says a lot about humans’ realization of the transience of culture and how future generations have a need to feed and build off of previous content, just as, in my opinion, children observe and emulate their parents' characteristics, but in their own special way.


I appreciated the 10 Myths being explained, and learning what exactly is not protected. I think the source of conflict in copyright law is its subjectivity. There are so many aspects that are dependent on interpretation. What is common property of our culture? The Good Copy/Bad Copy absolutely emphasized this idea, and the fact that the architecture of copyright law, although designed to protect, actually ends up curtailing cultural enrichment and new creation. I thought the Grey Album was such a fascinating concept, which uniquely mixed styles, races, and perspectives of music in a way that was aesthetically and musically genius. In my opinion, it seems like their should be some correlation between how much work a new artist puts into remixing work, and how much right they have to using the original. I know that completely contradicts intellectual property, but I am just trying to figure a way to tell the difference between something like the Grey Album, or even NWAs 100 Miles and Running, both totally new and unique creations with a ton of work put into them, which I appreciate and respect so much, versus someone who maliciously copies and tries to secretly promote a replica as their own. There is just so much difference in quality between copyright issue situations, and they are considered the same violations under law. If someone took my art and spent a lot of time and effort remixing it into a totally new and unique thing, I would celebrate them. Of course, it would be nice to get an attribution nod. It would be a completely different thing if someone blatantly copied and said it was their own.





Part 2: Fair Use


I absolutely loved the Fair(y) Use Tale, and recognized it as a sort of pun and direct illustration of the point that some things that are traditionally copyright violations are actually useful and poignant. Everyone knows that the work is Disney; it is how it is remixed that is the feature of the piece (as well as the example of the content explored, cleverly).


I still really don't understand this concept about Fair Use being a legal defense but not a right. Does that just mean that we have the potential to be protected, but only if we interpret it correctly? I don't agree with the vindication that if a unit can be taught without a certain free-usable copyrighted item, then it should not be used. That is so subjective. Yeah, technically, I could teach a unit on the Renaissance by reading an Art History text out loud. But would students be engaged, enriched, inspired, and transported without a video tour of the Sistine Chapel? Who is to say that a group of students does not deserve every angle, every perspective, every visual option that is deemed applicable? Wouldn't NOT showing everything tha

t we ourselves would want to see be limiting their perspective and censoring their creative development? As discussed by the documentary film directors, sometimes it seems that there is more benefit to society, more embracing of Art and Science, when the law is broken, than there is harm to the copyrighter. It is a real quandary that we find ourselves in with today’s media-saturated environment. I agree with the film makers who were making the point that sometimes copyright law unreasonably infringes on the preservation of our cultural history. At least they have a standardized statement now to refer to, which somewhat alleviates the guess work of fair use. It is important to look at the original purpose of copyright protection and compare it to what is actually being preserved when history and culture are private property.

A quick note on Shepard Fairey and the Obama poster:

Being an artist and high art teacher, I am highly aware of the issue of copying other people’s work off of the internet, digital manipulation, and young people’s opinions on the process and style that is produced. I have been following the Fairey case, and am absolutely shocked that the results were not made public to give me some kind of closure on my own mixed feelings! On one hand, I agree that the opinion of just grabbing something off the web is ok cause I’m changing it is wrong; and yet, on the other hand I recognize the incredible potential of using other people’s work as inspiration and a starting point in the creative process. The last thing I wanted to mention about the case is that it seems to me that when you are dealing with a public figure-head, there should be more leniency in the transfer of images. I mean, how else could Fairey get his photo? Take it himself? As a famous street artist though, he should have known that it would blow up and at least ask the photographer’s permission.


Part 3: Creative Commons Solution


Creative commons truly is the saving grace of copyright law oppression. Its not perfect, but at least there is some forum where people who recognize the importance of cultural sharing can post without fear of misuse (at least if you find out about it). As an Art teacher, I recognize that all art and creation is a form of remixing in some way. That is how humans work. We are influenced, we reflect, we learn, we respond. I really enjoyed both the Mayer & Beetle animation (that character sounds like a girl- Cartman, it was hilarious) and the Larry Lessig TED talk. I never understood the symbol delineations completely before and now feel more confident about interpreting them. I thought Lessig made a great analogy between the Supreme Court’s “common-sense” decision about allowing planes to fly over land without permission, and using common-sense in support of a read/write culture. His re-mix examples were awesome. He is so right about the youthful generation and their general apathy and being accustomed to always breaking the law: having no respect. It is the old adage: if you make the rules too extreme, there will be rebellion. I thought it was interesting when he said that today’s copyright laws are criminalizing the average person, and that we need to emphasize artists’ choices to share and be flexible about their content. There is definitely some catch up work to do in the nature of the law in response to the rapidly changing digital culture.




















Image Attributions:


In order of appearance

Copyright question.svg. By: Editor at Large. Unknown Date. Wikimediacommons.org

Parents Obey. By: Daquella Manera. 2008. CreativeCommons.org

Shepard Fairey Poster Photograph. By: David Shankbone. 2009. WikimediaCommons.org

Copy.Right.Now! By: Heinrich Boll Stiftung. 2010. WikimediaCommons.org


Sunday, October 24, 2010

FV_Voicethread Documentary

In this video, you can view the introduction of the web 2.0 tool Voicethread with the National Art Honor Society, as a way to brainstorm mural designs for the school this year.



WK3&4_Reading


Believe it or not, I actually took RL (Real Life) notes on the articles I've been reading...lots of great stuff for my Literature Review!